![]() ![]() In response to both decisions, the Roosevelt administration rescinded its exclusion orders and allowed internees to return to the West Coast. To understand her impact, we must go back to December 7, 1941. Why does this dissenting justice object to the majority’s ruling Put the following phrase in your own words: The principle then lies about like a loaded weapon, ready for the hand of any authority that can bring forward a plausible claim of an urgent need. ![]() The Endo decision effectively voided Korematsu. Mitsuye Endo is the name of someone you’ve probably never heard of but whose impact on America was profound. Government could not detain a citizen who was "concededly loyal" to the United States. Decided on the same day as the Korematsu case, but opposed to it in most respects, Ex Parte Endo, or Ex Parte Mitsuye Endo, (323 U.S. 214), which upheld the exclusion order that led to the internment of Japanese-American citizens on the West Coast during World War II as threats to national security. And Mitsuye Endo herself is a hero, who kept fighting for the freedom of all Americans even when she was offered her own freedom if she would stop. This volume contains the landmark decision Korematsu v. Light soiling and shelfwear, card pocket and law-library stamp to front pastedown, internally clean. Original tan buckram, red and black lettering pieces. Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1945. The decision was unanimous in the favour of Mitsuye Endo, and so there was no dissenting opinion. United States Reports, Volume 323: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at October Term, 1944, From October 2, 1944, To and Including (In Part) January 29, 1945. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |